[personal profile] floorpigeon
Ok, I feel like this should be self-evident, but it strikes me again that confidence and intelligence don't combine to equal correctness, even in questions where a 'correct answer' exists. This guy in our work-group was clearly confident and clearly did understand a lot of the material thoroughly and could easily synthesize the knowledge, but the answer he gave was way too broad (even if insightfully constructed and well-condensed), so that he didn't hit on the simple and straightforward information necessary but rather took the oppotunity to demonstrate his own insight. I must underline that I am comfortable and happy with highly intelligent people whether or not they're brusque or arrogant, it's just that I don't think the arrogance is supported when the answer isn't well-pointed. Most scientific/factual questions have simple answers that are narrow as well as clear. A broad answer is rarely best to narrow questions.

Another guy in our group answering the question was more amiable but even more fuzzy; he admitted his own fuzziness but merely prodded at the edges (of what was essentially a simple answer) and showed no great discomfort with his lack of precision. Note, I think this is better than a pre-supposed precision: Brainy Guy thought he was precise (that is, it all made sense in his head) but instead wasn't. I prefer at least knowing your flaws. However, Fuzzy Guy's lack of focused pressure to gain more precision made him, too, an underperforming scholar. Granted, he is eighteen.

My favorite responder was a girl who was neither 'fuzzy' nor arrogant, but rather clear and precise about everything she did and did not understand.

Granted, I myself am not very good at giving precise and focused answers, but neither am I (usually) arrogant, nor am I normally content to be fuzzy. I like helping people with writing because some fuzziness is ok, and 'clear' means somewhat different things in the context of writing, though I often have people who are naturally concise/straightforward get frustrated with me. I never want to be transparent (like, lowest-common-denominator or mass-appeal level clarity), but as intelligent as someone is, if they are too broad or imprecise verbally, I definitely think it's a sign they don't understand as much as they think.

Date: 2011-10-11 05:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cellia.livejournal.com
I think this also can tend to be a gender thing. Dudes are almost always confident, whether the answer is right or no (not saying this is a bad thing, just a trend). Women tend to be more cautious. So imho you can't use confidence with men giving answers as a test to likely rightness as well as you can with women. I think men usually understand this about each other, but it can make for some problematic signals in mixed groups.

Date: 2011-10-11 05:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] floorpigeon.livejournal.com
Yeah, but this guy was just super on it, and clearly did get what he was talking about. Fuzzy Guy was a contrast, too. The problem wasn't quite that Brainy Guy was wrong but that he was, in an odd way, missing the point. Probably some gender/macho thing mixed in, but he was the sort of confident that is convincing to me because he so clearly gets it, can synthesize globally quite well (a good sign of understanding). I might have a bias for global synthesis and ignore lack of obvious precision too much.


floorpigeon: (Default)
the one who stumbled

January 2015

181920 21222324

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 24th, 2017 03:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios